|
REPORT FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK BOOT CAMP,
APRIL 23 - 25, 2009
The bootcamp was an outstanding investment. Not
only will I save many times the cost of the bootcamp in avoiding any
mistakes in the future, but the networking now opens up the doors
to share deals. And of course the mailing lists is PRICELESS!
I just submitted an offer on a mobile home park in IA and thanks to
Frank and Dave, I'm more confident with my offer and exit strategy.
Be sure to share my words with Dave, Frank and Jim.
Dave G
Hi Frank & Dave,
I wanted to Thank You for all the great information and your time
away from your family this weekend. I got everything I was
specifically looking for and so much more. It was a great course. I
wish you and your family the best.
Take Care, Ron
If you seriously want to buy a mobile home park, or want to find
ways to run your existing park more profitably and with less risk,
then you do not want to miss the next Mobile Home Park Boot Camp.
This is the best product that Frank & Dave have ever put together,
and includes both classroom and field instruction in the mobile home
park business from A to Z. It's a three and ½ day immersion in the
industry, in which nothing will be held back, and every insider
secret and shortcut will be discussed.
To make this event affordable to everyone, we offer very generous
payment plans to meet every budget. Call for more details at (800)
950-1364. Our goal is to get you educated now, and paid later.
The dates of the next Boot Camp are July
24th-26th, 2009. We only sell 20 tickets. So if you want to
attend, you better hurry. We're like Southwest Airline's check-in;
it's strictly first come -; first served. You can sign up on-line at
www.mobilehomeparkstore.com, or call (800) 950-1364.
Environmental Due Diligence: Frequently Asked
Questions: FAQ Part 1
This article contains responses to Frequently-Asked-Questions (FAQs)
for MHP & RV Park Investors. We will be following up on this
initial FAQ in the next newsletter with "FAQ Part 2"
Are there any requirements to have an environmental site
assessment?
Depending on the lending institution that you are dealing with,
an ESA will probably be a requirement for financing, typically
based on company-specific guidelines and risk tolerance. In
general, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae),
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), major
commercial banks (typically), Small Business Administration
Commercial Loans, and others all require a Phase I ESA or
comparable investigation prior to granting new mortgages.
If I am not required to have one, why should I have an ESA on
the property I am purchasing?
Simply stated, for your protection. Most purchases of real
estate are for one of two reasons--as a residence or as capital
investment. One wants to be reasonably certain that they
purchase an asset and not a liability--and certainly not a
health hazard. This is true for residences and investment real
estate, either residential, commercial or industrial. Remember
that a properly executed ESA can be a another tool when you come
to the bargaining table. A seller also benefits by being able to
offer an inspected property to the market, particularly where
corrective action has been implemented. Just as important,
lenders can confidently make a loan on property where they know
that their clients will not be saddled with fines or clean-up
costs that may inhibit their ability to repay the loan. Further,
if foreclosure is a possibility, then the lender must know
whether past activities have resulted in problems that could be
inherited.
What is a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment?
The purpose of a complete Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) is to determine the likelihood of hazardous substances or
petroleum products being present that could result in a future
liability. It may involve an existing release, a past release or
the possibility of a future release that could have an impact on
soil, groundwater, surface water, or structures
on the property. Although a standard Phase I ESA (per ASTM
standards [discussed below]) typically only addresses CERCLA
liability, other environmental issues (e.g., asbestos, lead,
radon, and wetlands) can also be included within the scope of
the assessment.
A Phase I ESA in the U.S. consist of five basic components:
(1) A review and evaluation of state and Federal (i.e., U.S.
EPA) environmental databases that list sites of potential impact
within specified search distances;
(2) A review and evaluation of historical use information,
including aerial photographs and maps (e.g., USGS, fire
insurance, etc.), land title records, city directories, etc.;
(3) Interviews with owners and occupants of the property and
with government officials, as appropriate;
(4) Site reconnaissance to determine current and past uses and
conditions of both the property and adjoining properties; and
(5) Preparation of a report detailing conclusions and findings
generated from components (1) through (4) and presenting
appropriate recommendations for corrective action and/or further
assessment (e.g., Phase II).
Any Phase I Assessment should follow the standard practice for
conducting Phase I ESAs as specified by the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) E-1527-05 (latest edition) and U.S.
EPA requirements as promulgated in 40 CFR regarding All
Appropriate Inquiries (AAI). Sometimes there are also special
Phase I protocols developed by banks and other lending
institutions, law firms, insurance companies, developers,
franchisers, government, or other institutions.
Each site assessment concludes with a report that discusses all
activities, findings and information collected during the
assessment, and may include recommendations for corrective
action or further investigation.
What happens after these assessments?
Often, at the conclusion of the environmental site assessment
there are no reported recommendations for corrective action or
further investigation (and the transaction may proceed unimpeded
in regard to investigating or addressing environmental
conditions).
In some cases, there may be the need for some type of corrective
action ("routine" or "technical") that may include wastewater
discharge permitting, removal of hazardous wastes, UST closure,
etc.
In other cases, subsequent assessment may be warranted,
including: Phase II ESA-This involves site sampling and analysis
with a site-specific scope.
For specific questions on this or other environmental or private
utility issues, please contact Dave VerSluis of Sierra
Consultants at dversluis@sierraconsultants.net or
1-800-769-SIERRA (7437). www.sierraconsultants.net
Mr. VerSluis is a 20-year veteran of the
environmental industry, and is a Registered Environmental
Property Assessor (REPA), a Certified Environmental Strategist (eS),
an NSF Certified On-Site Wastewater System Inspector, a NEHA
Certified On-Site Wastewater System Installer, and is the Vice
President of the Michigan On-Site Wastewater Recyclers
Association. Mr. VerSluis is a frequent speaker and advisor on
behalf of MHPS.com & RVPS.com clients, specializing in MH & RV
communities nationwide.
|
THE STARS ARE FALLING
The manufactured home community business is breaking in two, and nobody has
noticed it. But its impact may change things forever, and certainly points the
way to the potential, and limitations, of the industry.
The see this enormous shift, all you have to do is get in your car and head into
Denver, Colorado -- although it could be any big city in the U.S. Once you get
there, drive into some 1 star communities and then into some 4 star ones.
The first thing you'll notice is the occupancy. The 1 star properties are full.
Every lot you can shoehorn a home onto is occupied. However, the 4 stars have
vacancies everywhere. You'll also notice that there are "For Sale" signs in the
windows of many of the homes in the 4 star communities, whereas there are hardly
any in the 1 star. If you call the managers and get the lot rents, you will also
find a strange phenomenon -; the rents are actually higher in some of the 1 star
properties. Higher occupancy, retention and rents in 1 star communities: how can
this be?
What's happening is the continued growth in demand for affordable housing, and
the continual lack of interest in the manufactured home product from those who
have other, more expensive, options.
$500 Per Month Is The Sweet Spot
If you earn minimum wage, and believe the government's assertion that you should
not spend more than 33% of your income on housing, then these Americans' budgets
are $15,000 x 33% divided by 12 = around $500 per month. This is about as much
as they can spend for the lot rent and home mortgage combined. They want a
detached single-family dwelling. What they have to choose from are older homes
in older 1 star communities -- the kind you can buy for $1,000 to $5,000. The
demand for this product is increasing daily. But there are no new parks being
built that meet this market, nor are there any new homes being built to serve
this demographic. As a result, they've bought every home available, and they are
so happy to have found such a niche that they have excellent retention and
satisfaction.
On the other hand, at the typical 4 star property, the combination of lot rent
and mortgage is around twice that figure -; over $1,000 per month. To meet this
housing, you have to earn about $30,000 per year. That's about twice the actual
housing budget for most folks seeking affordable housing. As a result, they have
no desire, or ability, to move into a 4 star community. They are simply priced
out. And the net result is empty lots at these communities.
The Rich Have More Options
Well, not really rich. In fact not well-to-do at all. But folks who can afford a
$1,000 per month housing payment have many choices that people with a $500
budget don't. For example, a stick-built home. Or a condo. Or a fancy apartment.
So those residents in 4 star communities are constantly battling the desire to
move to something nicer. And the minute they realize that they are upside down
in their manufactured home, with a $35,000 mortgage and a $20,000 resale value
(if they can find a buyer), they put a "For Sale" sign in the window and start
the process to upgrade into something better.
At the same time, those residents in the 1 star community have zero options.
They are thankful to have something to live in that meets their budget. So the
"For Sale" signs don't pop up in their windows at all. On the contrary, they
often bring in their friends and families to buy any homes that come on the
market in their price range.
Lower Home Payments Mean Higher Lot Payments
How is it possible that the 1 star rent can exceed the 4 star rent? Well, it's
just a matter of economics. In the 4 star property, the majority of the monthly
payment goes toward the home mortgage, plus its related property tax and
insurance. So that leaves less money for the lot rent. In the 1 star property,
the home costs are small, and there is more money available for the lot rent.
The community owner is the big winner in the affordable housing model.
Better Grab Reality Before It Beats You Over The Head
Affordable housing is flourishing. It's more expensive counterpart is flailing.
To right these problems, home costs must come down. If you own a 4 star
property, you need to get together with your peers and find a way to get the
manufacturers to put their collective minds around ways to build cheaper homes.
As home prices continue to rise, there is less money available for lot rent, and
more dissatisfaction in the end product, leading to poor retention.
And if you own a 1 star property -; "what recession?"
|
|
HOW HAS THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AFFECTED THE
VALUE OF PARKS AND COMMUNITIES?
The media frenzy about the economy and how dire and awful and how long it will
last is not the whole story. What the news doesn't tell us is that the
predictions and the current stories are compiled by throwing all of the bad news
that is either the dramatic news in over-built, over-supplied markets (Las
Vegas, Phoenix, Florida), or it is about average price declines. They purport
that this is true for all U.S. markets, all real estate and all commercial and
residential property types. This is not the case. Real estate will always be a
local business and, yes, national trends can have an affect, but the reporting
of the economic real estate news, especially for commercial real estate, needs
to be tempered by stirring some reality into the mix. And, a piece of that
reality is that from 2004 to mid-2007 it was like trying to "nail Jello to the
wall". There was no clear idea of what was going." (Stephen Blank, Senior
Fellow, Finance, the Urban Land Institute.) At least now the truth is starting
to come out. The Emperor has no clothes!, which is to say that a lot of deals
that were made during the overheated, frothy years didn't make sense. Too many
dollars were chasing deals without the normal rudimentary real estate
fundamentals. So here we are.
Much of the news about the recession is hyped. This isn't helpful to the
economy's recovery. It scares and confuses some investors, causing the behavior
of doing nothing. This "do nothing" behavior will only contribute to prolonging
the recession.
So what is it like today for selling a park or community? What is going on with
prices, financing and investors for parks and communities?
PRICE. For the last several years buyers and sellers have been fixated on the
cap rate. "I'll buy at a __ cap," said the buyers. "I'll take a __ cap," said
the sellers. Same thing with lenders. The cap rate was THE thing that mattered
the most. But a capitalization rate is only one measure of an investment and it
only measures the price as a ratio of the first year's net operating income.
So, the cap rate is being talked about a lot less, especially by buyers and
lenders, simply because there are other measures with which to evaluate
investments that go deeper into examining a property. The cap rate method
doesn't seem so relevant anymore. Instead, investors are looking for the highest
return on their cash. They are analyzing the "cash-on-cash" return and comparing
the highest returns against the risk (lenders) and alternate investments
(buyers).
Another method is the IRR (Internal Rate of Return) which measures the cash
flow, the tax benefits (depreciation), the principal reduction and the
appreciation over a 5 to 10 year hold. The IRR often helps to justify a higher
price than a cap rate because all of the financial benefits of owning investment
real estate are considered and not just the cash flow. The problem with the IRR
is that many investors either do not understand it or do not take the time to
use it. That may change as more lenders do more analysis and explain to the
buyer how the bank arrives at value. In addition, real estate isn't appreciating
at the current time.
FINANCING. The discussion about financing and the banks has been blown out of
proportion. Financing is harder to find and it takes longer because the lenders
are doing more due diligence than in the recent past. But financing is still
available, and some of it is quite good. It's a funny thing about lending and
investing. When capital was plentiful and easy to get, a lot of due diligence
was hurried through or maybe not reviewed in depth. Now, buyers and lenders want
more detail and ask more questions. But for anyone who has been through a few
economic cycles, what is really happening is a return to a more normal lending
environment. The biggest problem with bank financing today is higher down
payment requirements, which lowers the return and makes the property worth less.
With government sponsored loans (GSE's) like Fannie Mae, it is business as
usual, with good rates and reasonable terms. And, there are FHA programs, too.
For owners who want to sell for top dollar and also want an easier, faster,
cheaper transaction, Seller Financing is the way to go, and here is why. In the
past, economic down-turns caused sellers to carry some or all financing on the
sale. The difference between then and now is that the cash-out to a seller used
to be 7 to 10 years. Today, the buyers are talking about 3 to 5 years or just
long enough for lending to return to more "normal" requirements while the buyer
also builds a little equity in the property.
The words "seller financing" and "contract sale" often stir a negative reaction
in an owner. Owners/sellers, it seems, have been acculturated into not wanting
to do a contract sale. Contract sales are not for every seller and every
situation. For example, if you are doing a 1031 exchange, the sale needs to be
all cash in order to buy the substitute property. But, there are at least a
couple of reasons to consider a contract sale and some differences between this
down cycle and previous down cycles. This is a time to review your options and
not automatically discount anything.
DIFFERENCES.
Caliber of the Investors. Most sellers think of deadbeat buyers when they hear
the words "contract sale". Everyone either knows someone or has heard of someone
who experienced the buyer from hell who "milked" the property and never made a
payment to the seller. The reality is that this rarely happens, but still, this
on the top of owners minds. Today there are buyers who have solid, operational
and management experience as well as very healthy financial statements. They
want to buy parks and communities! These buyers know what they are doing and
could get bank financing, but don't want to because they have been so turned off
by the banks' requirements (higher down payments, longer decision times, higher
rates, shorter terms) and are frustrated by the banks' treatment of them. Before
discounting seller financing, be open to what kind of offers and buyers are out
there because these operationally and financially strong buyers are usually
willing to pay strong prices.
The same thing goes for Rent with Option to Buy. Sellers are also turned off by
this because they don't think it through. It's really interesting. In other
commercial/investment real estate venues such as office and retail, owners spend
thousands of dollars to build-out a space to rent to the tenant's specifications
with a one-month security deposit and one month's rent. If the tenant doesn't
honor the lease, the only money the owner gets is the one month's security
deposit. This is how leases in shopping centers and office buildings get done
everyday. In a Rent With Option to Buy the risk is minimized by the quality of
the tenant/buyer. With Rent with Option to Buy, the seller has these benefits:
1) The title to the property stays in the seller's name until the option is
exercised and the seller gets the money. If the worst case scenario occurs, and
the buyer/tenant doesn't make the payments or adhere to the terms (keep
community guidelines enforced, keep the occupancy at the same or higher as at
the sale/lease commencement, etc.), the seller retains title. The seller has a
lot of control. The lease is like a triple net lease (something that almost
every seller wants to buy but can rarely find) with the buyer paying all the
expenses for the community, collecting rents and giving the seller a rent check
every month.
2) Capital gains are not reported until the option is exercised, so there is
more time to plan for the use of the sale proceeds.
3) Due on sale clauses. Rent with Option to Buy as a financing vehicle was
conceived in the down-economy of the 1980's when banks were enforcing due on
sale clauses. It is a way to sell property without invoking the due on sale
clause, but the concept works well for sellers who want to maximize the sale
price and sell to a financially qualified and experienced operations buyer.
Pricing tends to be quite strong if the seller carries the financing. This is
because interest rates are low and the demand for parks and communities is
strong. In the past, when the economy went down, interest rates were higher,
causing prices to be lower. Selling a park/community is about maximizing wealth.
You can maximize your wealth by maximizing the price. It's even better if the
contract only needs to be carried for 3 to 5 years.
The upshot is that you can still sell your park or community in this over
"awfulized" economy. And, unlike some of the banks that are paralyzed with
paranoia and distrusting even the best borrowers, you can offer to finance your
property and act in a reasonable and realistic way to qualify the buyer and
assess his strengths. The financier, J. P. Morgan, in 1912 (during another
financial crisis) when testifying before congress on how he decided to make a
loan or investment said, "The first thing is character."
THE MULTI-FAMILY BUSINESS AND TODAY'S REAL ESTATE MARKET
The winner in today's economy is multi-family, especially, parks and
communities. Probably, the parks and communities are doing even a little better
than apartments. The reason is cash flow and demand. Unlike industrial, retail
and office properties which are impacted by job loss, the credit crunch and the
"mood" of the economy, people need a roof over their heads, so the cash flow is
seen as being more stable and predictable thus less risky than other real estate
types.
A prediction about multi-family from the 2009 Emerging Trends by the Urban Land
Institute is that there will be a flight to real estate by investors, especially
for multi-family investments. Cash flow is king in this economy. This is not to
say that all parks and communities will hold their value. To be sure, there are
plenty of troubled parks and communities. But, over all, park and community
investments should be stable in value during the downturn. Not all real estate
is the same and neither are all markets. In talking to community owners, the
annual rent increases seem to be occurring.
YES, PEOPLE BUY PARKS AND COMMUNITIES
IN A RECESSION
WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU ARE
SELLING YOUR PARK OR COMMUNITY
The financing for commercial real estate started to slow in mid-2007, because
the Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) that were sliced, diced, put
into traunches and sold to Wall Street started unraveling. During the
mid-2000's, Wall Street liked real estate! The exuberant, heated-up market for
these securities steadily cooled, then froze during 2008. Now commercial lending
in big, medium and small banks has reacted (even if they have few to no
commercial loans in default) by raising rates, requiring higher down payments,
and in general, being overly cautious in making new loans.
The potential problem is that large property loans that were made with 10% to
20% down payments and that are coming due may not be worth the amount owed on
them. This assumes that commercial real estate has "dropped 35% to 45% in value"
as the Wall Street Journal reported in late March. Really? For sure, there were
no doubt some communities that were purchased with overly optimistic pro formas
of big rent increases and slashed expenses. Capital was cheap and plentiful. It
was a classic case of too much capital chasing too few properties. Also, when
reports of falling commercial real estate prices are reported, the assumption is
that income on the asset is falling, which usually isn't the case with
communities.
But wait. Is it logical that banks will be taking back communities when loans
come due? Yes and no. A few banks might, but most community owners with loans
coming due in 2009 - 2013 will figure out a way to either work with their lender
or find an alternate strategy. Don't expect to see many "bank-owned" communities
for sale. And, bank owned communities will come with lots of issues, such as
vacancy, deferred maintenance and tertiary market locations.
"DON'T WASTE THIS RECESSION"
is a quote from marketing maven Joan Brown, MIRM of Marketing Specifics, Inc.,
Atlanta, GA speaking at the Spring ULI Manufactured Housing Community Council.
Joan's point is that new site-built housing is no longer an option for many
Americans. Because of the slide of home values, which could be a 60% decline by
the time the dust settles on this recession, people no longer think of a home as
an investment. Today's consumers think of a home as "shelter". If this is so, it
could help sell more homes in communities because the prospective community home
buyer isn't so worried about the "appreciation" that they are losing out on by
not buying a site-built house.
HUGGING EXISTING CUSTOMERS
Speaking at the spring Urban Land Institute meeting, a developer of luxury homes
said that he is spending a lot more time "hugging existing customers", and for a
couple of reasons. One is that he can no longer afford a big marketing budget
because sales are so anemic; and secondly, the existing customers might
recommend a friend, relative or business associate that would be a prospective
home buyer. There's a message here for community owners because in the past a
lot of park and community residents came by way of "referral" from existing
residents, especially family members. Besides residents, some others to consider
for a "hug" are:
Residential real estate agents
Chamber of Commerce members
Retailers
Installation companies
PARADIGM SHIFT
In the 1990's, many park and community residents moved from apartments to
communities. To us, the reasons for preferring a manufactured home over an
apartment are obvious, but many residents were sold on the fact that for about
what they were paying for apartment rent, they could own their own home. (Lot
rent and house payment.)
Nathan Smith, owner of SSK Communities, says that today's community monthly
payment for the lot rent and the house payment needs to be $50 to $75 under
apartment rent for the customer to justify making the move.
HIGH 5'S
To Bruce Simon of Park Advisors for hiring a former retail center manager
tooversee the company's park-owned homes sales and rentals. There must be lots
of talented but former managers of closed retail sales centers out there that
could bring their skills and knowledge to communities.
To the Manufactured Housing Council of the Urban Land Institute for bringing in
a marketing and public relations speaker to address the importance of targeting
marketing messages to women (the decision maker), soft programming in
communities and using social media to create new home buyers for communities
FHA Title I financing will be in place by summer. It is available for new and
pre-owned homes in communities. For more details, go to the Manufactured Housing
Institute website, www.mfghome.org. Preliminary information is that interest
rates will be very competitive. It's not too soon to find an FHA Title I lender
in your area. It is reported that the terms will be 3 1/2% down, 30 year
amortization and competitive interest rates.
To Bruce Nell of PGP Appraisals and his wife, Melanie, on the birth of their
son, Kevin on April 18, 2009.
To GE Capital's President Lew Grace, on loans due. GE will take the reasonable
approach, assuming the loan is current, and the owner is a good operator. If
this is the case, rather than taking the property back, GE Capital will work
with the borrower to get through the financial crunch.
NAI Iowa Realty Commercial
Joanne Stevens, CCIM, ALC
Broker Associate
116 Third Street SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Phone 319-378-6818
Direct 319-378-6786
Fax 319-365-9833
www.JoanneMStevens.com
|